
Holy War at the Box Office
I was browsing The Huffington Post today and happened to read the latest column by Jane Hamsher, entitled Maher Mangles Zucker at the Box Office. In a nutshell, the article champions the success (if you can call a #10 box office opening a “success”) of Bill Maher’s new film Religulous, by illustrating that although it only opened on a third as many screens as David Zucker’s new conservative comedy An American Carol, it made almost as much money ($35 million). By Hamsher’s logic, this makes Religulous three times as successful as An American Carol. She ends the article by noting, “There's no conspiracy going on against conservatives. When moviegoers have to vote with their dollars, it's just that nobody wants to see their shit.”
Of course, statements like these remind me that I must be some kind of masochist to constantly read the emotionally-driven rants at HuffPo, but the larger point is certainly valid. Much as conservatives like to decry how the liberal media is trying to maintain a stranglehold on the transmission of information, we must not forget that the news world--much like the world of cinema--is guided by the almighty dollar. Money talks, and if David Zucker’s #9 opening is any indication, we probably won’t be seeing a Carol sequel any time soon.
For the record, I saw Zucker’s film on Saturday, and for me it was sort of a mixed bag. I thought it raised a lot of really valid points about the hypocrisies and absurdities of Michael Moore and certain others, and some aspects were genuinely very funny. Unfortunately, though, the film was blatantly partisan to the point of discomfort: ACLU lawyers portrayed as zombies, liberals generalized as sheep and terrorist sympathizers. This type of humor is much more palatable when handled with more of a South Park approach; that is, raising necessary objections about the other side while still being sensible enough to poke fun at one’s own side for good measure. That’s where An American Carol falls desperately short. This film felt like one big bumper sticker slogan.
On the other side we have Bill Maher, just as merciless in his one-sidedness, but far more mean-spirited in the fact that he revels in his own dishonesty: duping real people into thinking he was recording a documentary about the spiritual journey and then ambushing them with his trademark sardonic charm. Granted we would expect nothing less from a comedian like Maher, of whom I am a genuine admirer, but still, you can’t help but think that he wasted a great opportunity for profound dialogue by taking a snide, preaching-to-the-choir approach. Maher raises a lot of really excellent questions about spirituality...and then immediately turns them into punch lines. That’s great for 90 minutes of laughs, but it’s not going to win a lot of converts.
Going back to the Hamsher article, I think she raises an interesting point but draws a disjointed parallel. Comparing a political comedy to a religious documentary (of sorts) is fair enough, but if I were to apply her same standard and compare Maher’s documentary to the Christian-themed Fireproof (a more direct contrast), which opened at #4 last weekend and remains at #8, then I could call Religulous an epic failure. Fireproof is only playing on 800 screens, and still grossed about three times the amount of Maher’s film in its opening weekend.
So I guess faith is still alive in America. Hamsher is right about one thing; there is no conspiracy against conservatives in Hollywood, but clearly there are some people who do want to “see their shit.”
Go figure.


